Indeed, the Court’s decision in Learning Resources v. Trump (2026), the tariffs case, revealed philosophical divides among ...

The UFC on Paramount+ era continues on Saturday, Feb. 21, after taking off last weekend for Valentine's Day. And with the ...

The limits of free speech in the UFC may have finally been found, and unsurprisingly they came during a Sean Strickland post-fight press conference in Houston. Strickland has been creating headaches ...

For the first time in more than half a century, there are no binding restraints on the buildup of the largest nuclear forces ...

Utah’s Supreme Court has rejected an appeal by Republican lawmakers and left in place a congressional map that gives ...

In a major setback for President Trump’s economic agenda, the court ruled that he could not invoke an emergency power to set tariffs on imports.

The Supreme Court divided 6-3 in finding that a federal law known as IEEPA does not authorize the president to impose tariffs.

The Supreme Court has dealt President Donald Trump a bruising loss on a cornerstone of his economic policy, striking down sweeping tariffs he imposed on nearly every country.

Cato Institute economist Alan Reynolds agreed that the law is irrelevant because "the U.S. Current Account [Trade] Deficit is Fully Funded by the Capital Account Surplus [net inflow of foreign capital ...